https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219816 The Tribunal held that sugarfree chewing gums were correctly classified under the residuary sub-heading 2106 90 99 instead of as diabetic foods under Subheading 2106 90 91. The demand for duty was deemed unsustainable as the products were not marketed as diabetic foods, leading to the rejection of the duty demand. Consequently, the impugned orders were set aside, and the appeals were allowed in favor of the appellant. en-us Mon, 11 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 31 Dec 2013 13:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219816 The Tribunal held that sugarfree chewing gums were correctly classified under the residuary sub-heading 2106 90 99 instead of as diabetic foods under Subheading 2106 90 91. The demand for duty was deemed unsustainable as the products were not marketed as diabetic foods, leading to the rejection of the duty demand. Consequently, the impugned orders were set aside, and the appeals were allowed in favor of the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 11 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219816