https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219787 The Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, quashing the impugned recovery notices issued by Customs authorities. It was held that the notices, targeting the petitioner's properties for the company's dues after her resignation, were illegal and lacked legal authority. The Court emphasized that recovery actions should only be directed at the actual defaulter, in this case, the company, and not third parties like former directors. The judgment highlighted the unconstitutional nature of the recovery actions and the violation of the petitioner's property rights. en-us Mon, 03 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 May 2013 14:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219787 The Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, quashing the impugned recovery notices issued by Customs authorities. It was held that the notices, targeting the petitioner's properties for the company's dues after her resignation, were illegal and lacked legal authority. The Court emphasized that recovery actions should only be directed at the actual defaulter, in this case, the company, and not third parties like former directors. The judgment highlighted the unconstitutional nature of the recovery actions and the violation of the petitioner's property rights. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 03 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219787