<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 790 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219775</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court set aside the State Information Commission&#039;s orders and the High Court ruling, emphasizing adherence to natural justice principles and specific findings under Section 20 of the Right to Information Act, 2005. The Court directed the Commission to decide the appeal on merits, granting the appellant a fair hearing. The disciplinary action against the appellant was deemed unjustified and ordered to be withdrawn.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 May 2022 13:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193145" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 790 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219775</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court set aside the State Information Commission&#039;s orders and the High Court ruling, emphasizing adherence to natural justice principles and specific findings under Section 20 of the Right to Information Act, 2005. The Court directed the Commission to decide the appeal on merits, granting the appellant a fair hearing. The disciplinary action against the appellant was deemed unjustified and ordered to be withdrawn.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219775</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>