<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 787 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219772</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the revenue and against the assessee on all three issues. The installation expenditure and software expenses were deemed capital in nature due to their connection with assets, while the disallowed amount was considered income from other sources rather than a bad debt or business loss. The appeal was dismissed with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2012 14:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193142" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 787 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219772</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the revenue and against the assessee on all three issues. The installation expenditure and software expenses were deemed capital in nature due to their connection with assets, while the disallowed amount was considered income from other sources rather than a bad debt or business loss. The appeal was dismissed with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219772</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>