<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 784 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219769</link>
    <description>The Court disposed of the writ petition challenging the notice for reopening assessment for the assessment year 1999-2000 under Article 226 of the Income Tax Act. The Court emphasized the importance of providing reasons for issuing notices and allowing the assessee to file objections. It clarified that the assessing officer&#039;s order dealing with objections need not be reviewed in every case challenging a Section 147 notice. The Court highlighted the discretionary nature of writ jurisdiction and suggested that the issue of whether the petitioner was afforded a reasonable opportunity could be addressed during the pending appeal before the CIT(Appeals). The rights and contentions of the parties were preserved for further proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2012 09:12:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193139" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 784 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219769</link>
      <description>The Court disposed of the writ petition challenging the notice for reopening assessment for the assessment year 1999-2000 under Article 226 of the Income Tax Act. The Court emphasized the importance of providing reasons for issuing notices and allowing the assessee to file objections. It clarified that the assessing officer&#039;s order dealing with objections need not be reviewed in every case challenging a Section 147 notice. The Court highlighted the discretionary nature of writ jurisdiction and suggested that the issue of whether the petitioner was afforded a reasonable opportunity could be addressed during the pending appeal before the CIT(Appeals). The rights and contentions of the parties were preserved for further proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219769</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>