<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 782 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219767</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, remitting Grounds 1, 2, and 3 back to the AO for re-evaluation. Ground 4, concerning the disallowance of bad debts written off, was decided in favor of the assessee based on the Supreme Court precedent allowing for bad debts to be written off in the accounts post-April 1, 1989.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 18:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193137" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 782 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219767</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, remitting Grounds 1, 2, and 3 back to the AO for re-evaluation. Ground 4, concerning the disallowance of bad debts written off, was decided in favor of the assessee based on the Supreme Court precedent allowing for bad debts to be written off in the accounts post-April 1, 1989.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219767</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>