<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 777 - ITAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219762</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remitted the case back for a fresh decision, emphasizing the importance of a fair hearing and comprehensive assessment. The appellant&#039;s challenges to undisclosed capital gains, sales consideration, and disallowance of depreciation claim were partially upheld, leading to a remittance for further review. The Tribunal stressed the need for a thorough and unbiased assessment process, highlighting the significance of addressing all grounds raised by the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 17:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193132" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 777 - ITAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219762</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remitted the case back for a fresh decision, emphasizing the importance of a fair hearing and comprehensive assessment. The appellant&#039;s challenges to undisclosed capital gains, sales consideration, and disallowance of depreciation claim were partially upheld, leading to a remittance for further review. The Tribunal stressed the need for a thorough and unbiased assessment process, highlighting the significance of addressing all grounds raised by the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219762</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>