<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 773 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219758</link>
    <description>A candidate who had already passed the written and oral examinations under the 1984 Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations could not be denied consideration for a licence merely because the 2004 Regulations later came into force. The saving clause preserved actions already taken under the earlier regime, and no disqualification under the 2004 framework was shown. The candidate was therefore entitled to issuance of the licence, subject to compliance with the remaining requirements under Regulation 10 of the 2004 Regulations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 11:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193128" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 773 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219758</link>
      <description>A candidate who had already passed the written and oral examinations under the 1984 Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations could not be denied consideration for a licence merely because the 2004 Regulations later came into force. The saving clause preserved actions already taken under the earlier regime, and no disqualification under the 2004 framework was shown. The candidate was therefore entitled to issuance of the licence, subject to compliance with the remaining requirements under Regulation 10 of the 2004 Regulations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219758</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>