https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219727 Where the competent authority had approved the appointment of the Member-cum-Acting Chairman for the stated tenure, a later ministerial notification correcting the earlier wording was held to be a conformity correction, not a fresh appointment or unlawful extension. The record showed approval for continuation until the appointee attained 65 years, BIFR was abolished, or further orders were passed. The Secretariat could not alter the substance of the approved proposal, but no illegality was found in the appointment as finally approved. The challenge to the modified notification therefore failed, and the appointment and continuance of the incumbent were upheld. en-us Tue, 09 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 21 Dec 2012 16:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219727 Where the competent authority had approved the appointment of the Member-cum-Acting Chairman for the stated tenure, a later ministerial notification correcting the earlier wording was held to be a conformity correction, not a fresh appointment or unlawful extension. The record showed approval for continuation until the appointee attained 65 years, BIFR was abolished, or further orders were passed. The Secretariat could not alter the substance of the approved proposal, but no illegality was found in the appointment as finally approved. The challenge to the modified notification therefore failed, and the appointment and continuance of the incumbent were upheld. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 09 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219727