<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 740 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219725</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, permitting cenvat credit for issues related to invoices lacking address and service details, invoices with different addresses, and transportation services. However, cenvat credit was not allowed for staff transportation by bus due to the lack of evidence of use for manufacturing or output services. Penalties were not levied, but interest in accordance with the law was to be applied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 12:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193095" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 740 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219725</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, permitting cenvat credit for issues related to invoices lacking address and service details, invoices with different addresses, and transportation services. However, cenvat credit was not allowed for staff transportation by bus due to the lack of evidence of use for manufacturing or output services. Penalties were not levied, but interest in accordance with the law was to be applied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219725</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>