<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 734 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219719</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decision in favor of the appellant, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s contentions. The court affirmed the right of the respondent to pay service tax on GTA services through CENVAT credit, in line with legal provisions and precedents, including Rule 3(4)(e) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The judgment emphasized the importance of the legal framework and the benefit extended to service providers under Section 68(2) of the Finance Act, 1994, ensuring clarity and consistency in tax laws and credit utilization for service tax payment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2014 14:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193089" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 734 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219719</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decision in favor of the appellant, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s contentions. The court affirmed the right of the respondent to pay service tax on GTA services through CENVAT credit, in line with legal provisions and precedents, including Rule 3(4)(e) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The judgment emphasized the importance of the legal framework and the benefit extended to service providers under Section 68(2) of the Finance Act, 1994, ensuring clarity and consistency in tax laws and credit utilization for service tax payment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219719</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>