<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 728 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219713</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by the Revenue. It upheld the deletion of the disallowance under Section 36(1)(iii) but restored the disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D, confirming the applicability of Rule 8D for the relevant assessment year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Jul 2013 14:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193083" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 728 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219713</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by the Revenue. It upheld the deletion of the disallowance under Section 36(1)(iii) but restored the disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D, confirming the applicability of Rule 8D for the relevant assessment year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219713</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>