<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 712 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219697</link>
    <description>The court directed the respondents to issue the necessary Customs House Agent license to the petitioner within eight weeks upon compliance with Regulation 10 of the 2004 regulations. The petitioner, who qualified in both written and oral examinations under the 1984 regulations, relied on a Supreme Court decision allowing candidates passing exams under the 1984 regulations to be eligible for license issuance under the 2004 regulations, provided they meet other criteria. The respondents failed to establish the petitioner&#039;s ineligibility under the 2004 regulations, leading to the court&#039;s decision in favor of the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 13:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193067" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 712 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219697</link>
      <description>The court directed the respondents to issue the necessary Customs House Agent license to the petitioner within eight weeks upon compliance with Regulation 10 of the 2004 regulations. The petitioner, who qualified in both written and oral examinations under the 1984 regulations, relied on a Supreme Court decision allowing candidates passing exams under the 1984 regulations to be eligible for license issuance under the 2004 regulations, provided they meet other criteria. The respondents failed to establish the petitioner&#039;s ineligibility under the 2004 regulations, leading to the court&#039;s decision in favor of the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219697</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>