https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219691 The Tribunal rejected both appeals, confirming the liability, interest, and penalties on the appellant-assessee for clandestine removal of finished goods. The benefit of Section 11AC for penalty payment was upheld at the appellate stage, despite the Revenue's appeal. The evidence, including the proprietor's admissions and buyers' statements, supported the findings of clandestine removal. The impugned order was deemed justified, and the appellant's contentions were dismissed. en-us Fri, 21 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 22 Dec 2012 13:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219691 The Tribunal rejected both appeals, confirming the liability, interest, and penalties on the appellant-assessee for clandestine removal of finished goods. The benefit of Section 11AC for penalty payment was upheld at the appellate stage, despite the Revenue's appeal. The evidence, including the proprietor's admissions and buyers' statements, supported the findings of clandestine removal. The impugned order was deemed justified, and the appellant's contentions were dismissed. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 21 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219691