<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 698 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219683</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the appellant&#039;s classification as a pakka arahtia, mandating book audits under section 44AB, and requiring TDS deductions on commission payments. The addition of Rs.3,04,511 to income under section 40(a)(ia) was upheld, and section 44AB applied for AY 2007-08. The Tribunal supported the lower authorities&#039; decisions, finding no merit in the appellant&#039;s contentions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 10:02:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193053" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 698 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219683</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the appellant&#039;s classification as a pakka arahtia, mandating book audits under section 44AB, and requiring TDS deductions on commission payments. The addition of Rs.3,04,511 to income under section 40(a)(ia) was upheld, and section 44AB applied for AY 2007-08. The Tribunal supported the lower authorities&#039; decisions, finding no merit in the appellant&#039;s contentions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219683</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>