<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 682 - ITAT, Mumbai</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219667</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed, with specific issues either upheld or remanded for further consideration by the Tribunal. The disputes ranged from disallowance of expenses for rural development and contractual liabilities to additions for interest payments and capital gains computation. The Tribunal&#039;s decisions were based on previous rulings and legal principles, resulting in a mixed outcome for the parties involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2012 12:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193037" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 682 - ITAT, Mumbai</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219667</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed, with specific issues either upheld or remanded for further consideration by the Tribunal. The disputes ranged from disallowance of expenses for rural development and contractual liabilities to additions for interest payments and capital gains computation. The Tribunal&#039;s decisions were based on previous rulings and legal principles, resulting in a mixed outcome for the parties involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219667</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>