https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219665 A second suit based on the same core dispute was held to be an abuse of process where the plaintiffs had already pursued substantially identical reliefs in a foreign court, failed there, and then omitted disclosure of the adverse appellate order in the Indian plaint. The court treated the non-disclosure as suppression of a material fact and found that the later affidavit did not create a fresh cause of action because the grievance had already arisen from the original refusal to transfer the claimed rights. Parallel proceedings on the same controversy after choosing the foreign forum first were treated as re-litigation and forum shopping. The suit was held not maintainable and dismissed. en-us Fri, 16 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Dec 2012 15:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219665 A second suit based on the same core dispute was held to be an abuse of process where the plaintiffs had already pursued substantially identical reliefs in a foreign court, failed there, and then omitted disclosure of the adverse appellate order in the Indian plaint. The court treated the non-disclosure as suppression of a material fact and found that the later affidavit did not create a fresh cause of action because the grievance had already arisen from the original refusal to transfer the claimed rights. Parallel proceedings on the same controversy after choosing the foreign forum first were treated as re-litigation and forum shopping. The suit was held not maintainable and dismissed. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 16 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219665