<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 666 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219651</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, affirming that bagasse qualifies as waste under Section 80JJA of the Income Tax Act. The respondent-assessee, engaged in manufacturing fuel briquettes from bagasse, met the conditions for claiming deductions under the Act. The Court dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, concluding that the respondent satisfied the requirements for availing the benefit of Section 80JJA, emphasizing that bagasse was indeed considered biodegradable waste for the purpose of the deduction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2013 18:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193021" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 666 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219651</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, affirming that bagasse qualifies as waste under Section 80JJA of the Income Tax Act. The respondent-assessee, engaged in manufacturing fuel briquettes from bagasse, met the conditions for claiming deductions under the Act. The Court dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, concluding that the respondent satisfied the requirements for availing the benefit of Section 80JJA, emphasizing that bagasse was indeed considered biodegradable waste for the purpose of the deduction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219651</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>