<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 647 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219632</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the demand of duty and penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 for clearing samples without payment of duty. The appellant&#039;s argument that unpacked samples were not excisable due to lack of packaging was rejected. The tribunal determined that even unpacked samples were subject to duty as they were still considered excisable goods. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the duty and penalty imposed for clearing samples without payment of duty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 18:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193002" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 647 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219632</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the demand of duty and penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 for clearing samples without payment of duty. The appellant&#039;s argument that unpacked samples were not excisable due to lack of packaging was rejected. The tribunal determined that even unpacked samples were subject to duty as they were still considered excisable goods. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the duty and penalty imposed for clearing samples without payment of duty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219632</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>