https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219628 The Tribunal waived the penalty imposed under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, but confirmed the penalty under Rule 27. The decision was based on legal precedents indicating that in such circumstances, only penalties under Rule 27 should be imposed. The case underscores the necessity of compliance with excise rules and timely duty payments to avoid penalties, while also highlighting the Tribunal's dedication to upholding legal principles and ensuring fair enforcement of regulations. en-us Wed, 12 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Dec 2012 16:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219628 The Tribunal waived the penalty imposed under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, but confirmed the penalty under Rule 27. The decision was based on legal precedents indicating that in such circumstances, only penalties under Rule 27 should be imposed. The case underscores the necessity of compliance with excise rules and timely duty payments to avoid penalties, while also highlighting the Tribunal's dedication to upholding legal principles and ensuring fair enforcement of regulations. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 12 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219628