<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 639 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219624</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed all appeals and cross-objections for the assessment years in question, upholding the decisions of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) on various issues including deletion of additions towards inadequate drawings, classification of income under different sections, credit for seized cash, sustaining de-novo assessment without confining to search materials, and denial of liability to interest. The Tribunal rejected the grounds raised by the Revenue, affirming the Commissioner&#039;s findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 14:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192994" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 639 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219624</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed all appeals and cross-objections for the assessment years in question, upholding the decisions of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) on various issues including deletion of additions towards inadequate drawings, classification of income under different sections, credit for seized cash, sustaining de-novo assessment without confining to search materials, and denial of liability to interest. The Tribunal rejected the grounds raised by the Revenue, affirming the Commissioner&#039;s findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219624</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>