<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 610 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219595</link>
    <description>Agricultural land remains outside the definition of &quot;capital asset&quot; where the cumulative facts show continued agricultural character on the date of transfer. Revenue records, actual cultivation, returned agricultural income, absence of conversion for non-agricultural use, and no development activity supported that conclusion; mere location within the Hyderabad Airport Development Authority area or the possibility of future non-agricultural use did not, by itself, alter the land&#039;s status. The area authority was not a municipality for section 2(14)(iii), and the statutory exceptions did not apply. On that basis, the capital gains addition was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 08:55:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192965" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 610 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219595</link>
      <description>Agricultural land remains outside the definition of &quot;capital asset&quot; where the cumulative facts show continued agricultural character on the date of transfer. Revenue records, actual cultivation, returned agricultural income, absence of conversion for non-agricultural use, and no development activity supported that conclusion; mere location within the Hyderabad Airport Development Authority area or the possibility of future non-agricultural use did not, by itself, alter the land&#039;s status. The area authority was not a municipality for section 2(14)(iii), and the statutory exceptions did not apply. On that basis, the capital gains addition was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219595</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>