<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 606 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219591</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal, restoring the matter to the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) for fresh determination of the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) using the Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM). The cross-objections by the assessee were also partly allowed. The TPO was directed to give the assessee a fair opportunity to present its case and to objectively examine the comparables for a proper application of TNMM.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 08:55:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192961" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 606 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219591</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal, restoring the matter to the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) for fresh determination of the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) using the Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM). The cross-objections by the assessee were also partly allowed. The TPO was directed to give the assessee a fair opportunity to present its case and to objectively examine the comparables for a proper application of TNMM.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219591</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>