<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 605 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219590</link>
    <description>The ITAT Kolkata ruled in favor of the appellant, upholding the exemption from taxation based on the principle of mutuality. The court emphasized the need for complete identity between contributors and participants for an entity to benefit from mutuality. Additionally, the court rejected the additions of undisclosed rent and transfer fee, asserting that services provided to members, even for remuneration, would still fall under the principle of mutuality.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 08:55:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192960" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 605 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219590</link>
      <description>The ITAT Kolkata ruled in favor of the appellant, upholding the exemption from taxation based on the principle of mutuality. The court emphasized the need for complete identity between contributors and participants for an entity to benefit from mutuality. Additionally, the court rejected the additions of undisclosed rent and transfer fee, asserting that services provided to members, even for remuneration, would still fall under the principle of mutuality.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219590</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>