<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 604 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219589</link>
    <description>The Tribunal affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision regarding the estimation of gross profit and consequential addition made by the AO for the assessment year 2004-05. The Tribunal upheld the addition after finding the assessee&#039;s explanations unsatisfactory and lacking in supporting details. Despite the assessee&#039;s arguments about business decline justifying the decrease in gross profit ratio, the Tribunal emphasized the burden on the assessee to provide evidence to support claims. As no fresh material was presented to challenge the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, the Tribunal confirmed the addition and dismissed the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 08:55:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192959" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 604 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219589</link>
      <description>The Tribunal affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision regarding the estimation of gross profit and consequential addition made by the AO for the assessment year 2004-05. The Tribunal upheld the addition after finding the assessee&#039;s explanations unsatisfactory and lacking in supporting details. Despite the assessee&#039;s arguments about business decline justifying the decrease in gross profit ratio, the Tribunal emphasized the burden on the assessee to provide evidence to support claims. As no fresh material was presented to challenge the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, the Tribunal confirmed the addition and dismissed the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219589</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>