<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 600 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219585</link>
    <description>The tribunal overturned the Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s decision under section 263 of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2006-07. It held that there was no error prejudicial to revenue in the original assessment order, deeming the CIT&#039;s decision unwarranted. The dispute over the disallowed 100% depreciation on centering material was resolved in favor of the appellant, who claimed the depreciation in good faith. The tribunal found the CIT&#039;s reliance on a High Court judgment to set aside the assessment due to non-initiation of penalty proceedings unjustified, directing the CIT to determine penalty imposition after a hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 17:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192955" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 600 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219585</link>
      <description>The tribunal overturned the Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s decision under section 263 of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2006-07. It held that there was no error prejudicial to revenue in the original assessment order, deeming the CIT&#039;s decision unwarranted. The dispute over the disallowed 100% depreciation on centering material was resolved in favor of the appellant, who claimed the depreciation in good faith. The tribunal found the CIT&#039;s reliance on a High Court judgment to set aside the assessment due to non-initiation of penalty proceedings unjustified, directing the CIT to determine penalty imposition after a hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219585</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>