<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 593 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219578</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal in a tax case involving disallowance of sales promotion expenses, employees&#039; contributions to ESI and PF, and interest expenses under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal reduced the disallowance of sales promotion expenses from 50% to 25% due to the necessity of such expenses in the business. It allowed the deduction for employees&#039; contributions made before the due date for filing the return of income, contrary to the AO&#039;s disallowance. However, it upheld the disallowance of interest expenses under Section 14A, concluding that investments yielding tax-free income justify such disallowance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 16:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192948" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 593 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219578</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal in a tax case involving disallowance of sales promotion expenses, employees&#039; contributions to ESI and PF, and interest expenses under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal reduced the disallowance of sales promotion expenses from 50% to 25% due to the necessity of such expenses in the business. It allowed the deduction for employees&#039; contributions made before the due date for filing the return of income, contrary to the AO&#039;s disallowance. However, it upheld the disallowance of interest expenses under Section 14A, concluding that investments yielding tax-free income justify such disallowance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219578</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>