https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219575 A discretionary pre-deposit condition requiring 50% of the penalty for hearing an appeal on merits was upheld because the appellant did not substantiate any retraction of the incriminating statement before the authorities and failed to place credible material showing genuine financial hardship. In these circumstances, the Tribunal's direction could not be treated as unjustified, and no interference was warranted. en-us Tue, 06 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Dec 2012 08:52:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219575 A discretionary pre-deposit condition requiring 50% of the penalty for hearing an appeal on merits was upheld because the appellant did not substantiate any retraction of the incriminating statement before the authorities and failed to place credible material showing genuine financial hardship. In these circumstances, the Tribunal's direction could not be treated as unjustified, and no interference was warranted. Case-Laws FEMA Tue, 06 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219575