https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219572 The dispute concerned whether a company properly completed a share transfer despite the claimant's prior notice of lost share certificates, an acknowledged police complaint, indemnity bond and prompt rebuttal to a third-party transfer application; the court applied transfer safeguard principles requiring signature verification, a cautionary endorsement, and production of FIR/injunction or acknowledged police complaint before transfer and found the company did not follow those procedures. Consequently the CLB order directing rectification of the register and allotment of the 100 shares to the claimant (or purchase and allotment) was upheld and the appeal dismissed. en-us Fri, 19 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Dec 2012 12:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219572 The dispute concerned whether a company properly completed a share transfer despite the claimant's prior notice of lost share certificates, an acknowledged police complaint, indemnity bond and prompt rebuttal to a third-party transfer application; the court applied transfer safeguard principles requiring signature verification, a cautionary endorsement, and production of FIR/injunction or acknowledged police complaint before transfer and found the company did not follow those procedures. Consequently the CLB order directing rectification of the register and allotment of the 100 shares to the claimant (or purchase and allotment) was upheld and the appeal dismissed. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 19 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219572