<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 586 - Bombay High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219571</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the appellant-revenue, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s order and remanding the case for reconsideration. The Court found the Tribunal&#039;s lack of reasoning for reducing the redemption fine, setting aside the demand for central excise duty, and overturning penalties and factual findings to be insufficient. The Tribunal was directed to provide detailed reasoning for its decisions on the redemption fine, duty demand, penalties, and factual findings. The appeal was disposed of with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Dec 2013 10:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192941" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 586 - Bombay High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219571</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the appellant-revenue, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s order and remanding the case for reconsideration. The Court found the Tribunal&#039;s lack of reasoning for reducing the redemption fine, setting aside the demand for central excise duty, and overturning penalties and factual findings to be insufficient. The Tribunal was directed to provide detailed reasoning for its decisions on the redemption fine, duty demand, penalties, and factual findings. The appeal was disposed of with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219571</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>