<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 583 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219568</link>
    <description>Fabrication of miter bends and reducers from duty-paid pipes at a project site did not amount to manufacture where the items were made in the site workshop and used in the same water-supply project. The record did not support the department&#039;s premise that the goods were manufactured in a workshop and removed to the site, and the Tribunal followed its earlier view that similar site-fabricated items are not dutiable manufacture. The central excise demand therefore could not be sustained, and the connected penalty, confiscation and redemption fine also fell.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 12:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192938" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 583 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219568</link>
      <description>Fabrication of miter bends and reducers from duty-paid pipes at a project site did not amount to manufacture where the items were made in the site workshop and used in the same water-supply project. The record did not support the department&#039;s premise that the goods were manufactured in a workshop and removed to the site, and the Tribunal followed its earlier view that similar site-fabricated items are not dutiable manufacture. The central excise demand therefore could not be sustained, and the connected penalty, confiscation and redemption fine also fell.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219568</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>