https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219564 The Tribunal held that the appellant, a model, fulfilled her service tax liability through her agent, Matrix, who was responsible for paying the tax on her behalf. Despite the activity falling under Business Auxiliary Service, Matrix's payment under Advertisement Agency Service did not absolve the appellant of liability. The Tribunal concluded that the appellant had discharged her tax obligations through Matrix, setting aside the demands confirmed against her. The appeal was allowed, and consequential relief was granted. en-us Tue, 09 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Dec 2014 11:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219564 The Tribunal held that the appellant, a model, fulfilled her service tax liability through her agent, Matrix, who was responsible for paying the tax on her behalf. Despite the activity falling under Business Auxiliary Service, Matrix's payment under Advertisement Agency Service did not absolve the appellant of liability. The Tribunal concluded that the appellant had discharged her tax obligations through Matrix, setting aside the demands confirmed against her. The appeal was allowed, and consequential relief was granted. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 09 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219564