https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219562 The Supreme Court held that the Commission was not obligated to disclose the names of Interview Board members under the Right to Information Act, 2005. It emphasized the need to balance the right to information with the right to privacy, citing exemptions under Section 8 of the Act to protect the safety and privacy of the Board members. The Court set aside the High Court's judgment, ruling in favor of the Commission and highlighting that disclosing such information could endanger the safety of the members without serving any significant public interest. en-us Thu, 13 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 Sep 2017 14:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219562 The Supreme Court held that the Commission was not obligated to disclose the names of Interview Board members under the Right to Information Act, 2005. It emphasized the need to balance the right to information with the right to privacy, citing exemptions under Section 8 of the Act to protect the safety and privacy of the Board members. The Court set aside the High Court's judgment, ruling in favor of the Commission and highlighting that disclosing such information could endanger the safety of the members without serving any significant public interest. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 13 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219562