<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 576 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219561</link>
    <description>Under the India-US tax treaty, marketing and management fees were examined under Article 12(4)(b), and the services were held not to satisfy the make-available requirement; the treaty therefore treated the India-linked portion as business profits under Article 7, while amounts for services rendered outside India were not taxable in India. Reimbursement of international telecom connectivity charges was treated as a pure pass-through of actual lease-line costs without mark-up, so it did not constitute royalty or taxable income. For a non-resident whose receipts were subject to tax deduction at source, interest under sections 234B and 234C was not leviable where the payer had the primary withholding obligation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2015 15:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192931" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 576 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219561</link>
      <description>Under the India-US tax treaty, marketing and management fees were examined under Article 12(4)(b), and the services were held not to satisfy the make-available requirement; the treaty therefore treated the India-linked portion as business profits under Article 7, while amounts for services rendered outside India were not taxable in India. Reimbursement of international telecom connectivity charges was treated as a pure pass-through of actual lease-line costs without mark-up, so it did not constitute royalty or taxable income. For a non-resident whose receipts were subject to tax deduction at source, interest under sections 234B and 234C was not leviable where the payer had the primary withholding obligation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219561</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>