<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 573 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219558</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the deletion of Rs. 53,98,229/- in a block assessment order for Assessment Year 1996-97, following the Commissioner&#039;s decision. The Court found that the undisclosed income from the seized Balance Sheet had already been taxed, making the additional amount unnecessary. The lack of evidence for the undisclosed stock value further supported the deletion, with the Court emphasizing the factual basis of the findings and the absence of significant legal issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 12:18:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192928" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 573 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219558</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the deletion of Rs. 53,98,229/- in a block assessment order for Assessment Year 1996-97, following the Commissioner&#039;s decision. The Court found that the undisclosed income from the seized Balance Sheet had already been taxed, making the additional amount unnecessary. The lack of evidence for the undisclosed stock value further supported the deletion, with the Court emphasizing the factual basis of the findings and the absence of significant legal issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219558</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>