<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 564 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219549</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to apply Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It was found that the funds were used for personal purposes, not business as claimed, and the transaction was not genuine. The Tribunal concluded that the provisions of Section 2(22)(e) were applicable due to the misuse of funds, leading to the dismissal of the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 18:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192919" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 564 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219549</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to apply Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It was found that the funds were used for personal purposes, not business as claimed, and the transaction was not genuine. The Tribunal concluded that the provisions of Section 2(22)(e) were applicable due to the misuse of funds, leading to the dismissal of the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219549</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>