<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 551 - CESTAT, Bangalore</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219536</link>
    <description>The tribunal granted waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery for the adjudged dues in a case involving demands raised on an appellant-company under the CENVAT Credit Rules 2004. The tribunal found that the appellant lawfully distributed credits for dutiable final products, not trading, as trading was not a taxable service during the material period. The demands lacked a sustainable legal basis, and the appellant&#039;s case on limitation was strong, leading to the favorable outcome of waiver and stay of recovery.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 18:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192906" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 551 - CESTAT, Bangalore</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219536</link>
      <description>The tribunal granted waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery for the adjudged dues in a case involving demands raised on an appellant-company under the CENVAT Credit Rules 2004. The tribunal found that the appellant lawfully distributed credits for dutiable final products, not trading, as trading was not a taxable service during the material period. The demands lacked a sustainable legal basis, and the appellant&#039;s case on limitation was strong, leading to the favorable outcome of waiver and stay of recovery.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219536</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>