https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219527 The dispute concerned verification of credit taken on common input services and the resulting requirement to maintain separate accounts and restrict credit utilisation for exempted services. The Tribunal noted that an earlier remand had called for factual verification, but the appellant had not fully cooperated or produced the required documents despite opportunities. It therefore granted a further opportunity for verification, but made continued consideration conditional on a pre-deposit and production of supporting records and a worksheet before the Commissioner, with liberty to seek extension if warranted. en-us Wed, 07 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Jan 2013 15:36:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219527 The dispute concerned verification of credit taken on common input services and the resulting requirement to maintain separate accounts and restrict credit utilisation for exempted services. The Tribunal noted that an earlier remand had called for factual verification, but the appellant had not fully cooperated or produced the required documents despite opportunities. It therefore granted a further opportunity for verification, but made continued consideration conditional on a pre-deposit and production of supporting records and a worksheet before the Commissioner, with liberty to seek extension if warranted. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 07 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219527