<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 534 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219519</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the confiscation of finished goods and packing material (drums) and imposition of penalties. It found that the appellants had not availed credit for the seized drums, which were old and used, purchased with non-cenvatable invoices and not entered in records. Consequently, the confiscation of goods and drums, as well as the penalties imposed, were deemed unjustified and were overturned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2014 14:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192889" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 534 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219519</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the confiscation of finished goods and packing material (drums) and imposition of penalties. It found that the appellants had not availed credit for the seized drums, which were old and used, purchased with non-cenvatable invoices and not entered in records. Consequently, the confiscation of goods and drums, as well as the penalties imposed, were deemed unjustified and were overturned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219519</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>