<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 532 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219517</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed the demand for interest on late payment related to wrongly availed Cenvat credit but set aside the penalty imposed under Rule 15(2) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, modifying it to Rs. 2,000 under Rule 15(3).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 19:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192887" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 532 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219517</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed the demand for interest on late payment related to wrongly availed Cenvat credit but set aside the penalty imposed under Rule 15(2) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, modifying it to Rs. 2,000 under Rule 15(3).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219517</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>