<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 515 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219500</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Applicant&#039;s Miscellaneous Application for modification of the Stay Order due to non-compliance with statutory provisions, including failure to make the required predeposit within the specified timeframe. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to pre-deposit requirements and limitations on modifying such orders, citing relevant legal provisions. Consequently, the Appeal was dismissed, finalizing the decision in the case involving significant duty and penalty amounts pending since 2010.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 15:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192870" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 515 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219500</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Applicant&#039;s Miscellaneous Application for modification of the Stay Order due to non-compliance with statutory provisions, including failure to make the required predeposit within the specified timeframe. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to pre-deposit requirements and limitations on modifying such orders, citing relevant legal provisions. Consequently, the Appeal was dismissed, finalizing the decision in the case involving significant duty and penalty amounts pending since 2010.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219500</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>