<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 489 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219474</link>
    <description>Section 115BBC did not apply to small box collections and other petty offerings received by a religious and charitable trust in the ordinary course of its gaushala and animal-care activities. The provision targets anonymous donations used as a conduit for unaccounted money, whereas these receipts were found to be bona fide visitor offerings, with known donations separately identified and earlier departmental acceptance of the trust&#039;s activities supporting that characterisation. On those facts, the receipts could not be treated as anonymous donations, and the addition was deleted; the departmental appeal failed and the first appellate relief was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 13:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192844" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 489 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219474</link>
      <description>Section 115BBC did not apply to small box collections and other petty offerings received by a religious and charitable trust in the ordinary course of its gaushala and animal-care activities. The provision targets anonymous donations used as a conduit for unaccounted money, whereas these receipts were found to be bona fide visitor offerings, with known donations separately identified and earlier departmental acceptance of the trust&#039;s activities supporting that characterisation. On those facts, the receipts could not be treated as anonymous donations, and the addition was deleted; the departmental appeal failed and the first appellate relief was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219474</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>