<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 480 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219465</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for deliberate misleading actions by the assessee in claiming excess depreciation, non-inclusion of excise duty in closing stock valuation, and disallowance of unpaid bonus. The appeal was dismissed, confirming the penalty of Rs. 73,71,366/- for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 16:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192835" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 480 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219465</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for deliberate misleading actions by the assessee in claiming excess depreciation, non-inclusion of excise duty in closing stock valuation, and disallowance of unpaid bonus. The appeal was dismissed, confirming the penalty of Rs. 73,71,366/- for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219465</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>