<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 479 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219464</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case back to the adjudicating authority for reconsideration after finding that the appellant&#039;s contract with Ultratech Cement Limited did not fall under Manpower Recruitment and Supply Agency services. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a fair decision based on natural justice principles and directed a fresh review of the case. The impugned orders were set aside, and the matter was kept open for further examination by the adjudicating authority, with the appellant agreeing to cooperate during the process. The stay petition and appeal were disposed of through remand for a comprehensive reassessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 18:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192834" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 479 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219464</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case back to the adjudicating authority for reconsideration after finding that the appellant&#039;s contract with Ultratech Cement Limited did not fall under Manpower Recruitment and Supply Agency services. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a fair decision based on natural justice principles and directed a fresh review of the case. The impugned orders were set aside, and the matter was kept open for further examination by the adjudicating authority, with the appellant agreeing to cooperate during the process. The stay petition and appeal were disposed of through remand for a comprehensive reassessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219464</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>