https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219451 The appeals were accepted as the Tribunal found that the Commissioner's actions violated the undertaking given to the High Court by signing the order during the stay order period. The Tribunal concluded that the impugned order could not be sustained due to the violation of the undertaking and failure to supply relied upon documents. The matters were remanded back to the Commissioner for de novo adjudication, with a directive to comply with the High Court's order by supplying the documents and allowing the appellant to cross-examine witnesses. en-us Tue, 08 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219451 The appeals were accepted as the Tribunal found that the Commissioner's actions violated the undertaking given to the High Court by signing the order during the stay order period. The Tribunal concluded that the impugned order could not be sustained due to the violation of the undertaking and failure to supply relied upon documents. The matters were remanded back to the Commissioner for de novo adjudication, with a directive to comply with the High Court's order by supplying the documents and allowing the appellant to cross-examine witnesses. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 08 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219451