<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 456 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219441</link>
    <description>The court held that the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act and the subsequent reassessment proceedings were beyond jurisdiction and unsustainable. It was determined that the reassessment was initiated solely based on a change of opinion without any concrete evidence that income had escaped assessment. Consequently, the court quashed the notice and the reassessment proceedings, ruling in favor of the petitioner without any costs imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 08:59:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192811" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 456 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219441</link>
      <description>The court held that the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act and the subsequent reassessment proceedings were beyond jurisdiction and unsustainable. It was determined that the reassessment was initiated solely based on a change of opinion without any concrete evidence that income had escaped assessment. Consequently, the court quashed the notice and the reassessment proceedings, ruling in favor of the petitioner without any costs imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219441</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>