<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 454 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219439</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the revenue, holding that the assessee was not entitled to claim depreciation on leased LPG cylinders and Air Jet Spindle Assembly and Positar Disc. The Court found discrepancies in ownership evidence, concluding that the assessee merely financed the purchases and did not own the assets, thereby disqualifying it from claiming depreciation. The revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed with costs of Rs. 25,000.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 08:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192809" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 454 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219439</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the revenue, holding that the assessee was not entitled to claim depreciation on leased LPG cylinders and Air Jet Spindle Assembly and Positar Disc. The Court found discrepancies in ownership evidence, concluding that the assessee merely financed the purchases and did not own the assets, thereby disqualifying it from claiming depreciation. The revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed with costs of Rs. 25,000.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219439</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>