https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219435 The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision to delete the addition of unexplained investment in share capital, citing legal precedents and the satisfactory discharge of onus under section 68. The High Court found no legal infirmity in the Tribunal's order and supported the decision based on established legal principles, ultimately dismissing the appeal. en-us Mon, 03 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Dec 2012 15:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219435 The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision to delete the addition of unexplained investment in share capital, citing legal precedents and the satisfactory discharge of onus under section 68. The High Court found no legal infirmity in the Tribunal's order and supported the decision based on established legal principles, ultimately dismissing the appeal. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 03 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219435