<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 443 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219428</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 26,83,750/- made by the AO under section 68 of the I.T. Act. The CIT(A)&#039;s findings that the gifts and loans were genuine and fully verifiable were confirmed, and the department&#039;s appeal was rejected. The ITAT agreed with the CIT(A) that the transactions were within the family and involved parties with substantial capacity and creditworthiness.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 20:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192798" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 443 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219428</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 26,83,750/- made by the AO under section 68 of the I.T. Act. The CIT(A)&#039;s findings that the gifts and loans were genuine and fully verifiable were confirmed, and the department&#039;s appeal was rejected. The ITAT agreed with the CIT(A) that the transactions were within the family and involved parties with substantial capacity and creditworthiness.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219428</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>