https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219417 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that no further duty should be levied on the seized goods as there was no evidence of attempted evasion or duty evasion, rendering confiscation unwarranted. Regarding the imposition of penalties, the Tribunal imposed a penalty of Rs. 5,000 under Rule 27 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, for the violation of not recording goods on a specific day, while dismissing any other penalties. The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order to the extent of penalty imposition, and fully allowed the connected appellant's appeal. en-us Thu, 03 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 29 Oct 2012 18:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219417 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that no further duty should be levied on the seized goods as there was no evidence of attempted evasion or duty evasion, rendering confiscation unwarranted. Regarding the imposition of penalties, the Tribunal imposed a penalty of Rs. 5,000 under Rule 27 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, for the violation of not recording goods on a specific day, while dismissing any other penalties. The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order to the extent of penalty imposition, and fully allowed the connected appellant's appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 03 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219417